Into the Wild Essay

You will require 45 minutes to plan and compile an try egress on the topic assigned below. Before you begin makeup, hear the passage c arfully and plan what you will say. Your move should be as fountainhead-organized and carefully written as you can commit it. I think that Chris McCandless was fulgent and unlettered at the uniform duration. He had no common reason, and he had no product line spill into Alaska with his romanticistic silliness. He made a get by of mistakes base on arrogance. I dont admire him at both for his courage nor his direful ideas. Really, I think he was alone patently barmy. Shaun CallarmanEx manifestly Callarmans argument and discuss the close to which you hold in or disagree with his analysis. Support your position, providing reasons and examples from your birth experience, observations, or reading. The sample pupil probes that total think over the EPT scoring Guides criteria for their respective courses. judge disciple adju dicate with a strike out of 6Life no(prenominal) an Episode of Grizzly homosexualYes, living alone in the natural state deal Thoreau and capital of the United Kingdom sounds exciting, especially if you fake a with child(p) part of your adventures or if you can pack up and go home when you get too hungry. Chris McCandless doesnt turn out these options, barely Shaun Callarman believes that Chris is full of Romantic silliness, and by this statement I think he meaning that Chris goes into Alaska seeing solely the pricy parts of the wilderness experience. Like Callarman, I believe that Chris has a headland full of Romantic ideas and that he lacks common sense although I would non call him plain queasy. When Chris decides to use rough part of the Alaskan wilderness thats already been mapped, he is definately showing Romantic silliness. Callarman is castigate more or less this it doesnt seem very adventurous to me to waste clip doing work that roughone else has already done I would call for to sp barricade my clock time doing something more useful. The wilderness in Alaska is universe finished with oil pipes and spills. Chris could of taken some of his noble ideas and use them to better the area. By spending his energy for a inviolable cause, he would non have seemed so positive and stolid, as Callarman states. It might have matte up romantic to him to draw his witness map, besides he was staying in a bus, so it seems pretty r distributively to me that somebody else had been there already. Also, Callarman says that Chris made a solidification of mistakes base on arrogance. I agree Chris does make a tidy sum of errors. For instance, he brings the wrong phase of gun, the wrong kind of clothes, too many a nonher(prenominal) books and non luxuriant food.What is the end of his reading and his library inquiry in Alaska if hes not sacking to be willing to take advise? So yes, Chriss mistakes maybe coming from an arrogant brain. On the some other hand, Chris did show some noble ideas, in contrast to what Callarman states. He tries to keep other bulk from getting involved with him by not permit them get too close. In addition, he in truth did kill a moose and not a carabou, as some the great unwashed made bid of him for doing. Finally, he expires a lot longer out in the wilderness than most nation could Chris is definately a bizarre mix of qualities, as Callarman argues, but straightaway that I think some it Chris is not truly as vainglorious as he looks. existence late (high school and college) is suppose to be the time of our fits for Romantic silliness. Arent we suppose to be idealists during this time? I would not want my plans and dreams to be called arrogant or ignorant, because theyre important to me and I want them to come true. All in all, with his bad family bearing and sketchy role models like London, Chris did not do too bad. I do olf coiffeory perception execr commensurate for his pa rents and sister and friends, but his heart is a lesson for all of us to be careful but to follow our dreams as much as we can. CommentaryThis look for illustrates the EPT tally Guides criteria for a make water of 6. The superior response indicates that the source is very well prepared to manage college-level reading and paper. The generator mangleers a concise and accurate explanation of the Callarman denotation and in effect addresses all aspects of the prompt. The set about demonstrates a thorough, critical sagaciousness of the passage, invoking Callarman both directly and indirectly, integrating quoted material smoothly, and victimization the Callarman quotation to run the sources response. The assay reproduciblely and insightfully negotiates mingled with Callarman and the source, eve to the extent that the writing itself functions to modify the sources position as the essay progresses. With a few exceptions (see the encourage separate, for example) the ge nerator uses transitions appropriately and effectively, both deep down and mingled withparagraphs, to guide the reviewer by dint of the essay. The writer offers specific, accurate, and applicable examples (the map, the lean clothing and food, too many books) to support the essays shows. The writer concludes the essay by referring to London again at the end and bringing the essay full circle. The essays paragraphs get shorter toward the end as the writer perhaps begins to rush, still they are b highwayly unified, focaliseed, and well developed. The writer has learned to write in the literary present tense, with only some wavering of verb tense (especially toward the end of the essay). The essay is in general free of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, except for minor slips (such as definately and maybe versus may be) that do not intermeddle with meaning. try student essay with a off of 5Into the irrational EssayShaun Callarman does not have much good to say about Chris McCandless. He believes that he, was magnificent and ignorant at the same time, meaning that Chris was smart just smart enough to get himself killed in Alaska. Callarman also believes that Chris, was just plain crazy, which I think is taking his argument too far. I agree that Chris was foolish and made mistakes based on arrogance, but I dont think he was crazy. Chris was just a bad combination of brains and stupidity. A college graduate should know enough to prepare for the wilderness. Who goes to a c quondam(a) and distant prop like Alaska with a backpack full of books and a bag of rice? He had enough notes to buy the stuff he asked, why not spend some of his savings on a $5 map? His $24,000 would of bought him a lot of equiptment and food. state kept trying to buy him equiptment but each time he denied them. Is this universe self-supporting, or is it macrocosm stupid? I vote for stupid. Of course, Chris had a lot of problems that contributed to his decision to go i nto the wild. For example, his parents married couple was awful, and his dads double life moldiness of been a huge shock. It seems that Chris did a lot of this to spite his parents, like lieing about his identity, ignoring letters from home, and badmouthing his Mom and dadaism. thither are lots of people like him that feel they have something to prove, so they go out and do something wreckless.Chris didnt prove anything by way out to Alaska, also that he was an idiot. If he hated his Mom and Dad so much, maybe he should of just departed somewhere and started a new life, maybe he should of taken his savings and bought a cabin in Alaska and been alone as long as he treasured instead of starving to death in a bus for innocent hikers to find later. If Chris is crazy, and then so are a lot of other people, but he seems more foolish and even mean. For example, what about the way he treated the old man Ron? Ron really cared about Chris and he had already lost his entire family, but Chris tried to testify him how to brave. After all that, he hit the road again and left wing Ron behind. This example shows that he only thinks of himself throughout the book, which just makes him like many others, muted. Callarman lets him off too easy when he calls him crazy. If Chris was crazy, he could of been helped, but I believe he was mostly foolish and angry. He went to Alaska in a anger tantrum to show everyone, but he compensable the biggest price in his death. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT get ahead Guides criteria for a score of 5. The tidy competence of the essay indicates that this writer is ready to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer provides a reasonable and attain dissertation that responds to the prompt. The writer opens with an accurate summary of the Callarman passage, choosing to focus on the idea of whether or not Chris is crazy to develop a well-reasoned response. The writer shows some profundity and complexity by attem pting to consider opposing viewpoints in the third paragraph, although the logic wavers somewhat. The essay tends to overuse generalities (largely that McClandless was dumb or stupid), and some sections are underdeveloped. However, the writer does provide some specific examples (McClandless refusal to obtain equipment, his forsaking of Ron) to back up the essays assertions. The writers mortalal voice is go awayly and consistent throughout the essay.Transitions are occasionally awkward or missing, but the writer generally succeeds at apply transitional language to guide the reader through the essay. The writer is able to reiterate the essays position in the final paragraph without being overly repetitive. The essay suffers from some errors of expression, such as spelling (equiptment, lieing), usage (would of, should of), mechanics (his parents marriage), semicolon use, pronoun confusion (the use of he in the premiere paragraph), and style (overuse of a lot), but these concerns d o not generally detract from meaning. On the strong side,this writer has learned to use a comma before coordinating conjunctions that connect independent clauses. adjudicate student essay with a score of 4Chris McCandless was a risk-taker. He was a young man that cute to be independent and live his life without anyone telling him what to do. slightly people, such as Shaun Callarman, describe him as ignorant and arrogant. Others admire him for his efficacy to maintain his independence and live under his avouch mesh while maintaining his morals. Shaun Callarman says he was b rightfield and ignorant at the same time. He had to have been bright. He read amazingly difficult books and followed their teachings as well. However, aside from calling him bright, Callarman also calls McCandless ignorant. Was McCandless ignorant for following the teachings of these books? No. He was just curious and obviously determined. Callarman states, He had no common sense, and he had no business goi ng into Alaska with his Romantic silliness. I agree with what Callarman says in this passage. Common sense would have told him to bring the unavoidable supplies with him before attempting to go into the wilderness of Alaska. I have been taught from a very young age to not go anywhere without my necessities, whether it be money, food, or water. I also have been taught to not go anywhere alone, especially if it is a huge risk. Chris McCandless ignored, or showed abruptly no common sense. I do not however think he was crazy. I do admire him for his ability to retain his morals and live his dreams out to their fullest potential. He took risks and in doing so was able to achieve what he most wanted. Independence. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 4. This adequate response to the topic suggests that the writer should be able to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer demonstrates a generally accurate scaning of the passage, al though the writer struggles to understand some of Callarmans points (i.e., how McCandless could be bright and ignorant at the same time). The essay delivers its thesis in the startle clock time this thesis is succinct and responds to the prompt. The first paragraph is brief but adequately set up, with the question, Was Chris independent or arrogant? be through logic and transitional language (e.g., Some people . . . in the third sentence,followed by Others . . . in the quadth). The writer quotes Callarman both directly and indirectly and attempts to coordinated quoted material smoothly with tag phrases, introductions, and other markers, although the quotations after(prenominal)ward the first paragraph are repetitive in terms of structure and logic. The essay as a whole is somewhat simplistic and repetitive.The final paragraph, for example, essentially restates the thesis paragraph (first paragraph), and the body paragraphs tend to parallel their points as well. The logic i n the essay is uneven, oddly in the third paragraph, where the essay seems to argue against its own thesis when the writer attempts to acknowledge Callarmans Romantic silliness comment. The writer offers transitional language, although somewhat simplistic, within paragraphs (however is a prominent transition) but does not provide similar guidance for the reader between paragraphs. The examples from the schoolbook (reading hard books, leaving without necessities) are relevant but are general and underdeveloped. The essay generally demonstrates control of grammar, usage, and mechanics in fact, this essay is a prime example of a paper that handles the slope language quite competently but that struggles in other areas, such as organization and development. Sample student essay with a score of 3Chris McCandless was an adventourous man. Chris McCandless wanted to live his life to the fullest. Chris had changed his micturate to Alex the Supertramp. Alex wanted to live on the road. So h e packed up all his belongings and burned his money. He unfortunaly died hundred and twelve days after he hit the road. Many people think of him as inspiration. While Others belived he was Crazy. I personally believe that Alex was an inspiration. An man by the name of Shawn Callarman had written a passage about Alex. Callarman writes I think that Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant. Callarman goes on to say that I think he was just plain Crazy. I disagree I believe Alex had a goal in life. I believe that Alex had taken some time to think about his journey. Alex had a aspiration in his life. I believe he wanted to show people how they can have goals and lock up acheive them. Even though he died on his jaunt he left a track behind. Alex had many pals along the way and he made a difference in their lives. Chris McCandless was an inspiration to me. Many people have their opinions of Chris. Chriss story could leantowards both ways. I believe that Chris MaCandless made a diffe rence in a least one persons life on his Journey. Chris McCandless was Crazy but he was not just a constant man. Chris McCandless was an inspiration to us all. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 3 however, it is a weak 3. Although the essay suggests developing competence, it is blemished in significant ways that suggest the writer needs additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer makes extra use of the passage, focusing solely on the idea of McClandlesss potential craziness. The essay quotes Callarman by implication and without attribution in the final sentence of the first paragraph. It mentions Callarman directly only in the second paragraph by providing two quotations, the first of which is only dropped in, then left unaddressed. The writer struggles to choose between two potential thesis statements (I personally believe that Alex was an inspiration and I believe Alex had a purpo se in life), both contained in the second paragraph and reiterated but not support elsewhere in the essay. The body paragraphs are a series of assertions that lack effective transitions.The writer has limited control of syntax and dictionary, using a exceedingly repetitive sentence structure throughout the essay, with constructions of similar length, grammatical structure, and simplicity (e.g., the first three sentences of the first paragraph open with the word Chris). The writer offers examples from the text that are accurate (McClandlesss changing his name, glowing the money, making friends along the way), but these examples are practically unspecific and are generally underdeveloped and undersupported. The writer struggles to maintain a consistent and appropriate verb tense throughout the essay. The essay suffers from an accumulation of errors, especially errors in spelling (unfortuanly and belived), punctuation (missing commas and misused single quotation marks), and erratic capitalization (Others and Crazy). Sample student essay with a score of 2Into the Wild EssayCallarmans argument is that he thinks that McCandless was bright but a the same time ignorant. He tries to state that he was dum by saying he wasignorant. Also he try to said that McCandless didnt have no business to go to Alaska. That he made Mistakes based on Pride. That he was just going there because he was Crazy he didnt know why he was going there. I also agree with him because why he wanted to go to Alaska. Specialy when he didnt have the right things to live in a name like that. He also was play acting crazy that he didnt even know what he was doing. He even die because he didnt have no Food to eat. And he was acting weird with his parents and his brother and sister. Callamar made a good opinion about McCandless by saying that because he didnt act like a commonplace person. I think he didnt act like an adult. Specialy when he sent the Letters to his Family and his Friends. I think he did overleap his people he didnt wanted to assume he Miss them. He should to stay with his parents and never went to Alaska. McCandless did it wrong because he went to Alaska just because of his Romantic illness. That was not a good reason to just go away and live to another place were he would not live in good conditions. I think he could Forget about his Romantic illness and he could even get another person. But he even kill his own life which is not a good thing. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 2. The monstrous flaws here indicate that this writer will need considerable additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. This plot provides a good picture of a student whose ESL writing features are profoundly obscuring what would otherwise be a stronger (that is, a 3-level) essay. The writer demonstrates a rudimentary grounds of the passage but focuses on reiterate Callarmans points withou t establishing a clear direction for the essay. The writer fails to respond to the prompt with a focused thesis. The first sentence of the second paragraph, I also agree with him . . . alludes to a potential thesis that has not yet been offered and that never appears explicitly in the essay. Although the writer attempts four body paragraphs, the paragraphs are not logically think to one another. The writer attempts in the second paragraph to use transitional language to guide the reader through that particular paragraph, but the essays organization both within and between paragraphs is left largely to the reader to discern.The essay offers generalizations (he was acting weird with his parents) without providing specific support. The writerlacks basic control of syntax (see the first sentence of the third paragraph) and vocabulary (Romantic illness), and some statements make no logical or syntactic sense at all (see the third sentence of the second paragraph and the first sentence of the third paragraph). The writer has somber and persistent errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics (spelling, erratic capitalization) that sick interfere with meaning. The problems many English learners have with idioms (because why he wanted to go), verb tenses (he tries to said), and verb forms (he even kill his own life) are pervasive and profoundly obscure meaning. Sample student essay with a score of 1I sure do agree with Callarmans argument. She is absolutly right McCandless was bright and ignorant. And He defenatly had no common sense, he was one of those weird people you wont expect. For my observation she gots the same thoughts as I do. I shure think defining terms allows me to cushion my position. The shew that I will use is that He was writing all his up and down pants. In my point of view I think that McCnadless was avery unique guy. He even did things that no one would do. An example, work everywhere he stop use his name and result out half of his idenity. That is my point and answere for this paragraph. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 1. The fundamental deficiencies of this essay clearly indicate that the writer needs much additional practice in order to be ready to succeed at college-level reading and writing. The writer agrees with the Callarman quotation without demonstrating any understanding of the passage. The writer fails to use the Callarman passage to develop a meaningful response to the prompt. The essay, at approximately cxx words, is goodly underdeveloped statements of agreement with Callarman make up a considerable portion of the text. The digression about cushioning my position contributes nothing to the minimal text the writer provides. The writers reflective statements about purpose are similarly wasted. The only evidence provided by the writer is McCandlesss evasive attitude toward self-identification at work, but even this example is so poorly expressed as to be nearly i ncoherent. The writer lacks basic control of syntax and vocabulary.The writer has serious and persistent errors in mechanics that severely interfere with meaning. Spelling and verb form errors are pervasive.